Crowdsourcing the June 2013 LSAT: June 2013 LSAT Explanation Central | About this project I'm going to rely on my summary of the two passages again here. Before I ever looked at the questions, I said "Passage A was more about the general problem of overbroad patents, using software as an example of the problem. Passage B was specifically about software, written by someone who works in the trenches of software patent litigation." Let's see if we can find an answer that embodies that.
A. No, I wouldn't call Passage A "objective." The author of Passage A definitely took a position, right off the bat, with the judging word "unfortunately." That's enough to make this answer wrong.
B. I can totally see this as the answer. Look again at my summary, above. That's a pretty good match for what this answer says. I like it.
C. No, Passage A isn't "critical" of the strategy of a company defending itself with a patent portfolio. This is out.
D. "Impasse"? What "impasse"? Passage A definitely mentioned a problem, but I don't think it was described as some sort of stalemate. And Passage B, while espousing the defensive strategy of a patent portfolio, wasn't talking about a "way out" of the problem... playing defense isn't the same thing as ending the war. No way.
E. Nope. Both Passage A and B were on the same side of the debate... the anti-patent side.
Our answer is B, because it's a fair description of the two passages. It matches our prediction quite nicely as well... I found this one pretty easy.
Please ask questions and/or suggest corrections to anything that seems confusing... we want to make this the best resource we can for LSAT students. We'll have all the June 2013 explanations up as quickly as possible. Thanks for reading. Tell your friends!
About me: I'm the owner of Fox LSAT and FoxTestPrep.com. Please email me at email@example.com, call me at 415-518-0630, Tweet me @nfox, check out my books here, and watch 15 hours of free LSAT classes here.